Pelican Score.Take the test ↗
← Score another pelicanPELICAN-V1 / 3EB40FEB
Check the rendered imageUnsupported or unsafe SVG content was removed. The judge scores this PNG; compare it with your original before interpreting the score.
Your sanitized SVG, rendered as a PNG
SAFE RENDER / 1024 × 1024SVG → PNG
PELICAN SCORE
80/ 100

He's got the bill, the wheels, and the scarf — now someone just needs to explain the chain to him.

A clearly identifiable pelican with a proper bill and pouch rides a mostly complete bicycle, with convincing body support and one foot on the pedal, though the drivetrain and second foot contact are unclear.

Machine 18/20Vision 62/80

Generated by GPT GPT-6 Astra (XHigh)Model information is self-reported.

THE REASONING

The bird, the bike, the details.

84% JUDGE CONFIDENCE

Pelican

12 / 15

Clear pelican identity: long orange bill with a distinct hanging throat pouch, eye, white body, folded wing, and a scarf. Neck/head/body relationships are coherent; the wing-to-handlebar attachment is slightly merged but minor.

Bicycle

13 / 15

Both wheels with hubs and spokes, a full diamond frame, saddle area, handlebars with stem, fork, and a visible crank with pedal are present. Minor incompleteness: no clearly readable chain/drivetrain and the saddle is largely hidden under the bird.

Riding

17 / 25

Body sits supported over the frame with a wing reaching the handlebars, and one orange foot rests on the visible pedal with a bent leg. The other foot is not clearly visible, and the seat contact is obscured by the body, leaving a remaining ambiguity.

Mechanics

11 / 15

Wheel hubs, frame, fork, steering and crank/pedal geometry connect plausibly. The drivetrain is vague: no chainring or chain is readable, so the drive path cannot be fully assessed.

Composition

9 / 10

Complete subject at a useful scale with clear silhouettes against a simple background; the bill overlaps the sun but remains legible. Only minor visual ambiguity in the leg/pedal area.

SVG quality

18 / 20

Deterministic checks of file health, visible pixels, composition bounds, and structural complexity.

Judge flags: No readable chain or chainring · Second foot/pedal contact not visible · Saddle largely hidden under body · Wing-handlebar contact slightly merged · Wing merges into handlebar; control contact ambiguous · Drivetrain reduced to a tiny vague chainring · No readable chain path · Seated support partly implied by overlap

Technical SVG checks +
SVG parse validWell-formed SVG XML.2/2
Sanitize successfulStatic SVG allowlist applied.2/2
Render successfulRendered at 1024 × 1024 on white.3/3
Meaningful pixelsVisible content detected.3/3
Content inside viewportPixel-edge heuristic; clipped invisible geometry cannot be fully inferred.2/2
Canvas utilizationVisible bounding box relative to canvas.2/2
Structural complexityElement and path budgets checked.2/2
No prohibited content2 unsafe or unsupported items removed.0/2
Technical SVG qualityNon-empty output and reasonable canvas proportions.2/2
Scoring version
pelican-v1
Judge
deepseek / deepseek-flash
Prompt
pelican-judge-v2
Judge runs
2
Renderer
resvg 2.6.2
SVG pipeline
static-svg-v2-local-use
Submitted (UTC)
2026-10-03 08:47

An experimental score, not a scientific verdict. Understand the limitations ↗

80/100 — Pelican Score | Pelican Score